3 Comments

Ever considered a cheaper tier that just comes with the articles? I'm not actually a game dev so a lot of that wouldn't be very useful to me and as a student it's hard to justify the full subscription just for the articles. These are extremely well researched and written though so I totally understand if you want to avoid devaluing your work.

Expand full comment

We've considered splitting the articles and Plus back end access in the past, yep, but haven't quite worked out if it is a good idea! Thanks for feedback. (BTW you commented on a free article, but I presume you just got an article with a $ element, which is why you came onto the site...)

Expand full comment

Thanks for the Sulfur details! About that Capcom comment... my impression is that Capcom follows a barbell strategy, with a relatively large amount of not very high budget games and then the Monster Hunters of the world. For the smaller releases in an apparatus the size of Capcom's (lots of popular things to cross-promote with, not a lot of costs for an additional entry on the catalog), I suspect it might work even with failed releases, so to speak.

The same approach is probably not viable for smaller publishers, though.

Expand full comment